H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Barbara Schett vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 0-1

Daja Bedanova holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2001 Los Angeles round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daja Bedanova #42 6-4 6-2 Barbara Schett #22 Match data Aug 9, 2001* R32 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,976 259 228 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schett Daja Bedanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,486 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1
18 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,530 0 0 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1
19 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,584 0 0 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1
20 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1
21 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,752 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1
23 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,937 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 2000 30–23 56.6% #22 1,825 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,759 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,751 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,574 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,576 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Schett Daja Bedanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1993 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1997 5 8 13 38.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 13 13 26 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 13 11 24 54.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 8 10 18 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 112 226 50.4% 102 73 175 58.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 31 31 62 50.0% — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Schett Daja Bedanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1492 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1487 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.21 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06
17 1993 1547 118.8 — — — — +14 +19 — 45.0% -0.25 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.73 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15
18 1994 1531 115.7 — — — — +14 +72 — 44.9% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 102.0 +0.38 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29
19 1995 1585 128.8 — — — — -34 +53 — 46.3% +0.24 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.72 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10
20 1996 1759 146.4 — — — — -85 +20 — 54.6% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 1–6 (14%) 103.2 -1.38 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74
21 1997 1752 144.0 — — — — -105 +101 — 53.3% +0.26 7–9 (44%) 6–2 (75%) 102.6 +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1822 150.4 — — — — -60 +37 — 58.2% +0.72 7–14 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 94.3 -1.19 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49
23 1999 1937 163.4 — — — — -17 -70 -291 62.7% +1.08 13–9 (59%) 8–9 (47%) 101.1 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 1825 147.2 — — — — +26 +52 — 58.5% +0.52 9–12 (43%) 4–7 (36%) 90.3 +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1760 148.2 — — — — +23 +63 -107 53.2% +0.46 8–8 (50%) 7–9 (44%) 95.6 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 1752 138.0 — — — — +9 +19 — 54.5% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1625 120.3 +0.36 -0.33 0.971 49.1% -22 +119 — 40.7% -0.78 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 96.2 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1575 114.7 -0.23 -0.21 0.988 49.7% +19 +86 +31 43.8% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1577 100.5 +0.57 +0.30 0.850 47.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1977 148.8 +0.18 -0.20 0.959 49.1% -17 +47 -124 53.4% +0.32 80–87 (48%) 48–61 (44%) 91.7 -0.42 — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.