H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Barbara Schett vs Iva Majoli H2H: 1-2
Iva Majoli holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on carpet, while Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1998 Hamburg fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1998* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Barbara Schett | 7-5 6-2 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1997* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Iva Majoli | 6-4 6-2 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1997* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schett | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |