H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Schett vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-2
Judith Wiesner holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1997 Maria Lankowitz quarterfinal 3-6 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1997* | Maria Lankowitz | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Barbara Schett | 3-6 7-5 6-0 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1993* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Judith Wiesner | 6-2 6-4 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1993* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Judith Wiesner | 7-5 6-2 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schett | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |