H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Barbara Schett vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 1-1
Barbara Schett and Larisa Savchenko are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on grass, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1999 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Barbara Schett | 6-2 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1995* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-7 6-4 7-5 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbara Schett | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |