H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Schett vs Lea Ghirardi H2H: 2-0
Barbara Schett holds a 2–0 lead over Lea Ghirardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Schett leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1996 Rome second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 52
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1996* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Barbara Schett | 6-2 6-3 | Lea Ghirardi | Match data |
| May 13, 1994* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Schett | 7-6 6-2 | Lea Ghirardi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Lea Ghirardi | #597 | #73 | 337 | 1,549 | 23 | 46 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schett | Lea Ghirardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #142 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #142 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |