H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Barbara Schett vs María Emilia Salerni H2H: 1-0
Barbara Schett holds a 1–0 lead over María Emilia Salerni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 2000 Sydney Olympics third round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2000* | Sydney Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Hard | Barbara Schett | 7-6(5) 6-4 | María Emilia Salerni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,976 | 259 | 228 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,556 | 31 | 61 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schett | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,759 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,751 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |