H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Barbara Schett vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-6

Monica Seles holds a 6–0 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Paris third round 6-2 6-3.

AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 6
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 8, 2002* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Monica Seles #10 6-2 6-3 Barbara Schett #20 Match data
Mar 3, 2000* Scottsdale WTA 500 R16 Hard Monica Seles #9 7-6(9) 6-1 Barbara Schett #13 Match data
Aug 21, 1999* Canadian Open WTA 1000 QF Hard Monica Seles #5 6-3 3-6 6-1 Barbara Schett #16 Match data
Oct 24, 1998* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Monica Seles #6 6-3 6-4 Barbara Schett #26 Match data
May 8, 1997* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Monica Seles #3 7-5 6-0 Barbara Schett #34 Match data
May 25, 1996* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Monica Seles #1 3-6 7-6 6-2 Barbara Schett #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,975 256 227 53.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schett Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,487 0 0 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,531 0 0 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,585 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1
21 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,762 0 2 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,936 0 2 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2000 27–22 55.1% #22 1,815 0 3 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,757 0 3 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,750 0 3 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,624 0 3 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,590 0 3 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,591 0 3 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53