H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbara Schett vs Natalia Baudone H2H: 1-0
Barbara Schett holds a 1–0 lead over Natalia Baudone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1996 Palermo third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1996* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Schett | 6-2 6-1 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Natalia Baudone | #934 | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbara Schett | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |