H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Barbara Schett vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 2-0
Barbara Schett holds a 2–0 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Schett leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1999 Manhattan Beach fourth round 2-6 4-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1999* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Barbara Schett | 2-6 4-2 (ret.) | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1998* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Barbara Schett | 6-3 6-1 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schett | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |