H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Barbara Schett vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 4-5

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 5–4 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 3–0 on carpet, while Barbara Schett leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 2000 Leipzig quarterfinal 4-6 6-0 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 5
9 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Tauziat #8 4-6 6-0 7-6(2) Barbara Schett #22 Match data Nov 4, 2000* QF Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Nathalie Tauziat #8 7-6(7) 6-2 Barbara Schett #24 Match data Oct 26, 2000* QF Moscow Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Barbara Schett #25 3-6 6-3 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #7 Match data Oct 14, 2000* QF Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #10 2-6 6-4 6-1 Barbara Schett #8 Match data Oct 24, 1999* F Kremlin Cup Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Barbara Schett #8 5-7 6-2 7-5 Nathalie Tauziat #11 Match data Oct 7, 1999* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Barbara Schett #20 6-1 4-6 7-6 Nathalie Tauziat #9 Match data May 14, 1999* R16 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Barbara Schett #20 3-6 6-4 6-0 Nathalie Tauziat #11 Match data Apr 30, 1999* R16 Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Nathalie Tauziat #8 4-6 7-5 6-1 Barbara Schett #29 Match data Oct 17, 1998* QF Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #21 6-3 0-6 6-0 Barbara Schett #52 Match data May 10, 1996* R16 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,976 259 228 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schett Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,486 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,530 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,584 0 0 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0
20 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0
21 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,752 0 2 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0
22 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,937 0 2 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1
24 2000 30–23 56.6% #22 1,825 0 3 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1
25 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,759 0 3 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,751 0 3 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,625 0 3 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3
28 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,574 0 3 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3
29 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,576 0 3 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Schett Nathalie Tauziat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1993 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1997 5 8 13 38.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4%
23 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7%
24 2000 13 13 26 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
25 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 2002 13 11 24 54.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
27 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2004 8 10 18 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0%
Career — 114 112 226 50.4% 102 73 175 58.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 31 31 62 50.0% — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Schett Nathalie Tauziat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1492 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1487 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.21 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27
17 1993 1547 118.8 — — — — +14 +19 — 45.0% -0.25 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.73 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +22 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17
18 1994 1531 115.7 — — — — +14 +72 — 44.9% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 102.0 +0.38 1986 1643 133.1 — — — — -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.66
19 1995 1585 128.8 — — — — -34 +53 — 46.3% +0.24 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.72 1987 1821 143.9 — — — — -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.28
20 1996 1759 146.4 — — — — -85 +20 — 54.6% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 1–6 (14%) 103.2 -1.38 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09
21 1997 1752 144.0 — — — — -105 +101 — 53.3% +0.26 7–9 (44%) 6–2 (75%) 102.6 +0.55 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.99
22 1998 1822 150.4 — — — — -60 +37 — 58.2% +0.72 7–14 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 94.3 -1.19 1990 1962 157.1 — — — — +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16
23 1999 1937 163.4 — — — — -17 -70 -291 62.7% +1.08 13–9 (59%) 8–9 (47%) 101.1 -0.50 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67
24 2000 1825 147.2 — — — — +26 +52 — 58.5% +0.52 9–12 (43%) 4–7 (36%) 90.3 +1.95 1992 1935 154.0 — — — — +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30
25 2001 1760 148.2 — — — — +23 +63 -107 53.2% +0.46 8–8 (50%) 7–9 (44%) 95.6 -0.61 1993 1976 158.3 — — — — +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82
26 2002 1752 138.0 — — — — +9 +19 — 54.5% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.34 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62
27 2003 1625 120.3 +0.36 -0.33 0.971 49.1% -22 +119 — 40.7% -0.78 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 96.2 -0.90 1995 1845 146.3 — — — — -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26
28 2004 1575 114.7 -0.23 -0.21 0.988 49.7% +19 +86 +31 43.8% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 +0.88 1996 1800 152.0 — — — — -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06
29 2005 1577 100.5 +0.57 +0.30 0.850 47.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.22 1997 1977 157.1 — — — — -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2026 161.2 — — — — 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.49
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32
Career — 1977 148.8 +0.18 -0.20 0.959 49.1% -17 +47 -124 53.4% +0.32 80–87 (48%) 48–61 (44%) 91.7 -0.42 — 2034 158.4 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.