H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Schett vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 2-2
Barbara Schett and Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 2–1 on clay, while Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1999 Hamburg third round 3-6 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1999* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Schett | 3-6 6-2 7-6 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1999* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-2 6-2 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
| May 3, 1997* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-1 7-5 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1995* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Schett | 6-3 6-1 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schett | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 |