H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Barbara Schett vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 1-2
Sabine Appelmans holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 2–0 on carpet, while Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1996 US Open first round 1-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Barbara Schett | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1994* | Linz | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Sabine Appelmans | 7-5 6-4 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1993* | Montpellier | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Sabine Appelmans | 6-2 7-5 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schett | Sabine Appelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 |