H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Barbara Schett vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 1-2

Sabine Appelmans holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 2–0 on carpet, while Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1996 US Open round of 128 1-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Schett #44 1-6 6-4 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #23 Match data Aug 28, 1996* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Sabine Appelmans #30 7-5 6-4 Barbara Schett #160 Match data Feb 12, 1994* SF Linz Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Sabine Appelmans #66 6-2 7-5 Barbara Schett #166 Match data Oct 16, 1993* QF Montpellier Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,976 259 228 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,925 284 205 58.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schett Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,486 0 0 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,467 0 0
18 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,530 0 0 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,584 0 0 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1 1992 29–16 64.4% #26 1,895 0 3
21 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,752 0 2 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,834 0 3
22 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,937 0 2 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 2000 30–23 56.6% #22 1,825 0 3 1996 26–17 60.5% #21 1,832 0 7
25 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,759 0 3 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,855 0 7
26 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,751 0 3 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,722 0 7
27 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,625 0 3 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,778 0 7
28 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,574 0 3 2000 22–23 48.9% #49 1,697 0 7
29 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,576 0 3 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,689 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Schett Sabine Appelmans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
17 1993 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 15 6 21 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0%
19 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 26 8 34 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1997 5 8 13 38.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 7 8 15 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
22 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
23 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2000 13 13 26 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 4 16 75.0%
25 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 12 10 22 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 9 18 50.0%
26 2002 13 11 24 54.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
27 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 11 8 19 57.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 2004 8 10 18 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 13 12 25 52.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 112 226 50.4% 102 73 175 58.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 31 31 62 50.0% — 139 90 229 60.7% 54 49 103 52.4% 22 17 39 56.4% 69 49 118 58.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Schett Sabine Appelmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1492 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 1987 1502 99.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 — — +0.44
16 1992 1487 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.21 1988 1498 106.4 — — — — — +40 — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.03
17 1993 1547 118.8 — — — — +14 +19 — 45.0% -0.25 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.73 1989 1468 98.3 — — — — +65 +26 — 31.3% -0.50 1–1 0–2 — +0.98
18 1994 1531 115.7 — — — — +14 +72 — 44.9% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 102.0 +0.38 1990 1679 133.0 — — — — +19 -159 — 59.2% +0.76 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 103.2 +2.93
19 1995 1585 128.8 — — — — -34 +53 — 46.3% +0.24 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.72 1991 1873 150.3 — — — — +27 -285 — 69.9% +1.36 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +1.14
20 1996 1759 146.4 — — — — -85 +20 — 54.6% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 1–6 (14%) 103.2 -1.38 1992 1896 145.1 — — — — +3 -146 — 61.0% +0.64 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 104.4 -0.44
21 1997 1752 144.0 — — — — -105 +101 — 53.3% +0.26 7–9 (44%) 6–2 (75%) 102.6 +0.55 1993 1835 135.0 — — — — +9 -112 -193 53.1% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 98.4 +0.40
22 1998 1822 150.4 — — — — -60 +37 — 58.2% +0.72 7–14 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 94.3 -1.19 1994 1822 144.0 — — — — +46 -108 — 58.0% +0.80 10–2 (83%) 5–4 (56%) 106.6 +0.26
23 1999 1937 163.4 — — — — -17 -70 -291 62.7% +1.08 13–9 (59%) 8–9 (47%) 101.1 -0.50 1995 1809 140.0 — — — — -2 -18 — 57.6% +0.37 5–5 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 99.8 -0.91
24 2000 1825 147.2 — — — — +26 +52 — 58.5% +0.52 9–12 (43%) 4–7 (36%) 90.3 +1.95 1996 1833 145.6 — — — — -10 -70 -165 62.1% +0.81 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 95.3 +0.59
25 2001 1760 148.2 — — — — +23 +63 -107 53.2% +0.46 8–8 (50%) 7–9 (44%) 95.6 -0.61 1997 1855 155.7 — — — — -46 -8 -89 58.7% +0.54 9–14 (39%) 4–7 (36%) 93.5 -1.41
26 2002 1752 138.0 — — — — +9 +19 — 54.5% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.34 1998 1722 138.4 — — — — +60 +2 +76 47.1% -0.26 1–9 (10%) 3–3 (50%) 89.5 -0.30
27 2003 1625 120.3 +0.36 -0.33 0.971 49.1% -22 +119 — 40.7% -0.78 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 96.2 -0.90 1999 1778 137.2 — — — — +27 -92 -38 56.3% +0.48 5–8 (38%) 7–9 (44%) 95.0 -0.07
28 2004 1575 114.7 -0.23 -0.21 0.988 49.7% +19 +86 +31 43.8% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 +0.88 2000 1697 139.6 — — — — +36 -31 +95 48.5% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 7–6 (54%) 100.1 -0.37
29 2005 1577 100.5 +0.57 +0.30 0.850 47.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.22 2001 1689 101.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.19
Career — 1977 148.8 +0.18 -0.20 0.959 49.1% -17 +47 -124 53.4% +0.32 80–87 (48%) 48–61 (44%) 91.7 -0.42 — 1925 148.8 — — — — +14 -69 -45 57.1% +0.51 71–69 (51%) 40–49 (45%) 95.3 +0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.