H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Barbara Schett vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-0

Barbara Schett holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1995 Palermo round of 32 6-1 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Schett #107 6-1 3-6 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #44 Match data Jul 13, 1995* R32 Palermo Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,976 259 228 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schett Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,486 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,530 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,584 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,752 0 2 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,937 0 2 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 2000 30–23 56.6% #22 1,825 0 3 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,759 0 3 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,751 0 3 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,625 0 3 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,574 0 3 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,576 0 3 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Schett Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1993 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1997 5 8 13 38.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2000 13 13 26 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2002 13 11 24 54.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2004 8 10 18 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 112 226 50.4% 102 73 175 58.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 31 31 62 50.0% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Schett Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1492 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1487 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.21 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 1993 1547 118.8 — — — — +14 +19 — 45.0% -0.25 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.73 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 1994 1531 115.7 — — — — +14 +72 — 44.9% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 102.0 +0.38 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 1995 1585 128.8 — — — — -34 +53 — 46.3% +0.24 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.72 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1996 1759 146.4 — — — — -85 +20 — 54.6% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 1–6 (14%) 103.2 -1.38 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1997 1752 144.0 — — — — -105 +101 — 53.3% +0.26 7–9 (44%) 6–2 (75%) 102.6 +0.55 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1998 1822 150.4 — — — — -60 +37 — 58.2% +0.72 7–14 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 94.3 -1.19 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1999 1937 163.4 — — — — -17 -70 -291 62.7% +1.08 13–9 (59%) 8–9 (47%) 101.1 -0.50 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 2000 1825 147.2 — — — — +26 +52 — 58.5% +0.52 9–12 (43%) 4–7 (36%) 90.3 +1.95 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 2001 1760 148.2 — — — — +23 +63 -107 53.2% +0.46 8–8 (50%) 7–9 (44%) 95.6 -0.61 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 2002 1752 138.0 — — — — +9 +19 — 54.5% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.34 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 2003 1625 120.3 +0.36 -0.33 0.971 49.1% -22 +119 — 40.7% -0.78 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 96.2 -0.90 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 2004 1575 114.7 -0.23 -0.21 0.988 49.7% +19 +86 +31 43.8% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 +0.88 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 2005 1577 100.5 +0.57 +0.30 0.850 47.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.22 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1977 148.8 +0.18 -0.20 0.959 49.1% -17 +47 -124 53.4% +0.32 80–87 (48%) 48–61 (44%) 91.7 -0.42 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.