H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbara Schwartz vs Els Callens H2H: 1-2
Els Callens holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Schwartz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Els Callens leads 1–0 on carpet, while Barbara Schwartz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Els Callens won the 2002 Wimbledon first round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 47
Left-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Els Callens | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Barbara Schwartz | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2001* | Knokke-Heist | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Schwartz | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | Els Callens | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1999* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Els Callens | 7-6 6-3 | Barbara Schwartz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schwartz | #699 | #40 | 732 | 1,643 | 35 | 54 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schwartz | Els Callens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #125 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #183 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |