H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Barbara Schwartz vs Erika De Lone H2H: 0-1
Erika De Lone holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Schwartz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 47
Left-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Erika De Lone | 6-3 6-2 | Barbara Schwartz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schwartz | #699 | #40 | 732 | 1,643 | 35 | 54 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schwartz | Erika De Lone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #125 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #183 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |