H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Schwartz vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 1-1
Barbara Schwartz and Kristie Boogert are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Schwartz won the 1999 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 47
Left-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Barbara Schwartz | 6-2 6-4 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
| May 21, 1998* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Kristie Boogert | 6-1 6-2 | Barbara Schwartz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schwartz | #699 | #40 | 732 | 1,643 | 35 | 54 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schwartz | Kristie Boogert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #125 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #183 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |