H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Barbara Schwartz vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 1-0

Barbara Schwartz holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Schwartz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Schwartz won the 1998 Roland Garros round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Schwartz
AUT Age 47 Left-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Schwartz #115 6-4 6-2 Miriam Oremans #54 Match data May 28, 1998* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Schwartz #699 #40 732 1,644 35 54 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schwartz Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 0–3 0.0% #209 1,463 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0
19 1998 3–6 33.3% #118 1,473 0 0 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0
20 1999 13–13 50.0% #42 1,638 0 0 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0
21 2000 0–6 0.0% #748 1,543 0 0 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 2001 6–8 42.9% #90 1,582 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0
23 2002 10–11 47.6% #125 1,597 0 0 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 2003 2–1 66.7% #183 1,626 0 0 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0
25 2004 1–6 14.3% #311 1,541 0 0 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Schwartz Miriam Oremans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2000 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2002 4 4 8 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2003 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
Career — 14 19 33 42.4% 16 25 41 39.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Schwartz Miriam Oremans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1463 98.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 — — +0.15 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66
19 1998 1474 108.8 — — — — +44 +37 — 36.8% -0.74 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.21 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45
20 1999 1639 138.2 — — — — -34 -46 — 52.5% +0.41 4–5 (44%) 2–5 (29%) 100.5 -0.37 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65
21 2000 1544 95.5 — — — — +25 — — 14.3% -2.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41
22 2001 1582 111.5 — — — — -12 — -18 45.2% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 +0.12 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91
23 2002 1597 121.2 — — — — +10 -30 — 52.9% +0.18 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.15 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41
24 2003 1627 116.2 — — — — +14 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 — — +0.01 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65
25 2004 1542 96.5 -2.12 +0.06 0.595 37.0% — -49 — 20.0% -1.87 0–1 0–1 — -0.02 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42
Career — 1644 123.6 -2.12 +0.06 0.595 37.0% -6 -29 -18 43.8% -0.32 12–19 (39%) 7–13 (35%) 96.6 +0.18 — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.