H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Barbara Schwartz vs Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor H2H: 0-1

Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Schwartz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 2000 Hobart International round of 32 4-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Schwartz
AUT Age 47 Left-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
FRA Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #36 4-6 6-4 6-3 Barbara Schwartz #42 Match data Jan 12, 2000* R32 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Schwartz #699 #40 732 1,644 35 54 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #739 #29 917 1,771 109 123 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schwartz Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 0–3 0.0% #209 1,463 0 0 1993 1–3 25.0% #167 1,500 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1994 2–5 28.6% #122 1,501 0 0
19 1998 3–6 33.3% #118 1,473 0 0 1995 7–12 36.8% #94 1,499 0 0
20 1999 13–13 50.0% #42 1,638 0 0 1996 12–12 50.0% #85 1,604 0 0
21 2000 0–6 0.0% #748 1,543 0 0 1997 14–17 45.2% #57 1,621 0 0
22 2001 6–8 42.9% #90 1,582 0 0 1998 21–21 50.0% #33 1,723 0 0
23 2002 10–11 47.6% #125 1,597 0 0 1999 28–21 57.1% #36 1,708 0 1
24 2003 2–1 66.7% #183 1,626 0 0 2000 19–19 50.0% #65 1,685 0 1
25 2004 1–6 14.3% #311 1,541 0 0 2001 5–13 27.8% #160 1,584 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Schwartz Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 3 6 9 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 3 3 6 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2000 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 5 7 12 41.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 8 8 16 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 2002 4 4 8 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 16 7 23 69.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 6 12 50.0%
24 2003 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 7 7 14 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
25 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 14 19 33 42.4% 16 25 41 39.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — 32 45 77 41.6% 54 51 105 51.4% 6 11 17 35.3% 17 16 33 51.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Schwartz Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1463 98.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 — — +0.15 1993 1500 99.2 — — — — — +21 — 22.2% -1.11 1–0 0–1 — -0.37
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1501 106.6 — — — — +33 +24 — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.18
19 1998 1474 108.8 — — — — +44 +37 — 36.8% -0.74 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.21 1995 1499 114.1 — — — — +22 +53 — 41.3% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +1.84
20 1999 1639 138.2 — — — — -34 -46 — 52.5% +0.41 4–5 (44%) 2–5 (29%) 100.5 -0.37 1996 1605 116.8 — — — — -51 +10 — 49.1% -0.17 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 101.4 +0.63
21 2000 1544 95.5 — — — — +25 — — 14.3% -2.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.21 1997 1622 127.2 — — — — -60 +70 -53 42.3% -0.52 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +0.34
22 2001 1582 111.5 — — — — -12 — -18 45.2% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 +0.12 1998 1723 142.2 — — — — -8 +16 -196 51.5% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 103.8 -2.23
23 2002 1597 121.2 — — — — +10 -30 — 52.9% +0.18 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.15 1999 1708 133.4 — — — — -20 +50 -170 53.7% +0.36 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 +1.32
24 2003 1627 116.2 — — — — +14 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 — — +0.01 2000 1685 129.4 — — — — +41 -11 -131 49.4% -0.17 8–3 (73%) 3–1 (75%) 107.1 -0.58
25 2004 1542 96.5 -2.12 +0.06 0.595 37.0% — -49 — 20.0% -1.87 0–1 0–1 — -0.02 2001 1584 110.0 — — — — +63 +22 — 35.7% -1.17 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 -0.91
Career — 1644 123.6 -2.12 +0.06 0.595 37.0% -6 -29 -18 43.8% -0.32 12–19 (39%) 7–13 (35%) 96.6 +0.18 — 1771 132.0 — — — — -2 +30 -126 46.9% -0.27 38–32 (54%) 18–18 (50%) 106.9 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.