H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Schwartz vs Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor H2H: 0-1
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Schwartz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 2000 Hobart third round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 47
Left-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2000* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Barbara Schwartz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schwartz | #699 | #40 | 732 | 1,643 | 35 | 54 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schwartz | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #125 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #183 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |