H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Barbara Schwartz vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 2-0

Barbara Schwartz holds a 2–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Schwartz leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schwartz won the 2002 US Open round of 128 6-4 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Schwartz
AUT Age 47 Left-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Schwartz #83 6-4 4-6 6-2 Silvija Talaja #79 Match data Aug 28, 2002* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Barbara Schwartz #50 6-2 6-1 Silvija Talaja #34 Match data Oct 29, 1999* R16 Linz Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Schwartz #699 #40 732 1,644 35 54 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 131 152 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schwartz Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 1996 0–3 0.0% #209 1,463 0 0 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,587 0 0
19 1998 3–6 33.3% #118 1,473 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,554 0 0
20 1999 13–13 50.0% #42 1,638 0 0 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,602 0 0
21 2000 0–6 0.0% #748 1,543 0 0 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,699 0 0
22 2001 6–8 42.9% #90 1,582 0 0 2000 25–28 47.2% #29 1,643 0 2
23 2002 10–11 47.6% #125 1,597 0 0 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,541 0 2
24 2003 2–1 66.7% #183 1,626 0 0 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,561 0 2
25 2004 1–6 14.3% #311 1,541 0 0 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,545 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Schwartz Silvija Talaja
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2000 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 18 9 27 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 11 15 26 42.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 2002 4 4 8 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 6 10 16 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2003 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 14 13 27 51.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 14 19 33 42.4% 16 25 41 39.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — 54 72 126 42.9% 64 58 122 52.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 2 8 10 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1/7 of Barbara Schwartz's and 11/68 of Silvija Talaja's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Barbara Schwartz Silvija Talaja
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 2004 1/7 0.0 4.0 53.7% 40.9% 26.3% 14.3% 25.0% 34.1% 39.2% 2003 4/36 1.3 1.5 50.8% 55.1% 43.2% 58.3% 52.8% 49.3% 42.8%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/24 2.4 3.4 58.2% 63.5% 42.0% 55.5% 33.8% 54.2% 40.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 2/8 1.5 4.5 61.3% 62.4% 30.0% 58.3% 40.0% 49.2% 26.6%
Career — 1/89 0.0 4.0 53.7% 40.9% 26.3% 14.3% 25.0% 34.1% 39.2% — 11/283 1.8 2.9 56.1% 60.3% 40.3% 57.0% 41.8% 51.5% 38.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Schwartz Silvija Talaja
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1482 107.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–0 — -0.02
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1486 96.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.23
17 1996 1463 98.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 — — +0.15 1995 1456 101.4 — — — — — +52 — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1588 117.3 — — — — — +65 — 62.1% +0.86 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.42
19 1998 1474 108.8 — — — — +44 +37 — 36.8% -0.74 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.21 1997 1554 99.9 — — — — — +85 — 38.5% -0.92 0–1 — — +0.70
20 1999 1639 138.2 — — — — -34 -46 — 52.5% +0.41 4–5 (44%) 2–5 (29%) 100.5 -0.37 1998 1603 114.3 — — — — -33 +19 — 54.8% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.52
21 2000 1544 95.5 — — — — +25 — — 14.3% -2.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.21 1999 1700 132.3 — — — — -87 +71 -46 57.5% +0.55 13–15 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 102.0 +1.18
22 2001 1582 111.5 — — — — -12 — -18 45.2% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 +0.12 2000 1643 137.9 — — — — -51 +129 +73 45.8% -0.08 13–5 (72%) 3–4 (43%) 107.9 -2.17
23 2002 1597 121.2 — — — — +10 -30 — 52.9% +0.18 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.15 2001 1542 116.1 — — — — +25 +122 — 35.7% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.2 +0.71
24 2003 1627 116.2 — — — — +14 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 — — +0.01 2002 1562 119.3 — — — — +33 +31 — 47.4% -0.24 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +1.04
25 2004 1542 96.5 -2.12 +0.06 0.595 37.0% — -49 — 20.0% -1.87 0–1 0–1 — -0.02 2003 1548 116.1 -2.31 -0.57 0.845 46.5% +6 +93 +47 44.0% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 3–6 (33%) 97.2 +0.68
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1546 112.4 -0.46 -1.30 0.878 47.1% -22 +86 — 46.4% -0.21 4–6 (40%) 1–1 — +0.24
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1507 106.7 -1.52 -3.11 0.524 38.5% -10 — — 33.3% -0.61 0–2 0–2 — +0.31
Career — 1644 123.6 -2.12 +0.06 0.595 37.0% -6 -29 -18 43.8% -0.32 12–19 (39%) 7–13 (35%) 96.6 +0.18 — 1811 127.0 -1.33 -1.36 0.798 45.3% -16 +78 +13 47.5% -0.10 52–53 (50%) 23–24 (49%) 102.1 +1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.