H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Schwartz vs Vanessa Webb H2H: 0-1
Vanessa Webb holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Schwartz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vanessa Webb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vanessa Webb won the 2000 Auckland third round 6-1 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 47
Left-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 50
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2000* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Vanessa Webb | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Barbara Schwartz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schwartz | #699 | #40 | 732 | 1,643 | 35 | 54 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vanessa Webb | #838 | #107 | 316 | 1,500 | 8 | 25 | 24.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schwartz | Vanessa Webb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #459 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #125 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #183 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #116 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |