H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Isabella Shinikova H2H: 1-0
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 1–0 lead over Isabella Shinikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2021 Prague third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 34
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2021* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-2 6-3 | Isabella Shinikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 168 | 101 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| Isabella Shinikova | #381 | #133 | 442 | 1,569 | 4 | 11 | 26.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Isabella Shinikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #384 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,954 | 2 | 9 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |