H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 0-1
Lucie Hradecka holds a 1–0 lead over Barbora Krejcikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2014 Quebec City fourth round 3-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2014* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lucie Hradecka | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |