H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Barbora Strycova vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 1-0

Barbora Strycova holds a 1–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2014 Birmingham semifinal 7-6(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbora Strycova #62 7-6(5) 6-1 Casey Dellacqua #43 Match data Jun 14, 2014* SF Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 288 300 49.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,757 80 106 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbora Strycova Casey Dellacqua
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 14–16 46.7% #57 1,560 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,489 0 0
19 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,488 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,472 0 0
20 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,476 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,474 0 0
21 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,455 0 0 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,501 0 0
22 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,501 0 0
23 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,523 0 0 2008 18–17 51.4% #53 1,629 0 0
24 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,597 0 0
25 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,563 0 0
26 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,541 0 0
27 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,583 0 1 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,592 0 0
28 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,490 0 0
29 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,741 0 0
30 2016 36–24 60.0% #20 1,788 0 1 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,628 0 0
31 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,869 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 24–23 51.1% #33 1,766 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,714 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,600 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbora Strycova Casey Dellacqua
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 11 9 20 55.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
24 2010 5 11 16 31.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2012 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 19 14 33 57.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 2016 22 18 40 55.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2015 3 9 12 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
31 2017 30 16 46 65.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 175 339 48.4% 77 86 163 47.2% 46 36 82 56.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — 53 74 127 41.7% 10 16 26 38.5% 17 16 33 51.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 485/587 of Barbora Strycova's and 163/185 of Casey Dellacqua's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Barbora Strycova Casey Dellacqua
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/1 1.0 4.0 57.3% 57.8% 53.7% 56.3% 35.3% 56.1% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 5/30 1.0 4.4 54.2% 63.7% 41.8% 48.3% 52.7% 53.8% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 3/23 2.3 3.7 55.5% 53.2% 40.0% 42.9% 55.6% 47.5% 37.9% 2004 1/2 2.0 6.0 53.4% 56.4% 41.2% 66.7% 37.5% 49.3% 43.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/3 1.0 7.0 54.3% 63.2% 50.0% 33.3% 42.9% 57.1% 36.8%
21 2007 3/7 1.0 3.7 67.6% 55.3% 40.0% 61.6% 52.8% 50.3% 39.7% 2006 1/7 1.0 7.0 47.4% 55.6% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0% 47.4% 26.5%
22 2008 13/14 1.5 1.6 70.6% 55.6% 41.6% 47.5% 42.6% 51.2% 42.5% 2007 17/18 1.8 3.6 60.5% 60.6% 44.5% 42.3% 53.2% 54.1% 44.7%
23 2009 24/33 1.0 2.1 68.2% 56.5% 46.4% 49.1% 49.5% 53.3% 41.7% 2008 31/35 2.9 4.3 58.6% 63.1% 44.2% 54.4% 49.5% 55.4% 45.2%
24 2010 36/38 1.5 1.9 66.1% 59.3% 47.9% 56.1% 43.5% 55.5% 43.7% 2009 3/3 1.0 5.3 52.8% 46.5% 36.2% 28.4% 13.9% 42.2% 38.4%
25 2011 46/50 1.6 1.7 65.6% 58.1% 45.4% 49.8% 53.5% 53.5% 44.3% 2010 7/7 1.0 3.4 53.5% 55.2% 40.5% 37.9% 37.3% 48.1% 42.3%
26 2012 30/34 2.2 2.6 63.3% 56.4% 41.9% 50.2% 51.0% 50.9% 42.0% 2011 6/8 2.0 4.5 64.2% 60.4% 45.9% 63.2% 81.9% 55.0% 44.2%
27 2013 7/11 2.4 2.7 65.0% 61.8% 45.8% 56.4% 54.5% 56.2% 41.1% 2012 22/24 1.0 3.8 62.7% 59.3% 39.5% 49.5% 47.4% 51.8% 43.4%
28 2014 42/52 2.4 2.7 60.7% 62.8% 46.2% 56.3% 47.1% 56.3% 41.1% 2013 9/9 0.9 3.0 61.8% 57.4% 45.2% 49.0% 53.9% 52.6% 33.7%
29 2015 45/57 2.2 2.6 62.8% 63.8% 49.0% 56.2% 50.8% 57.8% 43.0% 2014 41/44 1.7 3.0 59.5% 62.2% 49.4% 54.3% 48.9% 56.9% 43.5%
30 2016 55/60 2.4 2.2 66.8% 62.2% 48.0% 54.2% 52.3% 57.6% 45.7% 2015 24/25 2.0 3.3 62.4% 61.9% 50.1% 52.0% 50.0% 57.4% 39.6%
31 2017 66/66 2.2 2.1 65.7% 62.6% 47.3% 54.7% 53.0% 57.2% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 45/47 2.0 3.0 64.1% 64.4% 48.2% 55.6% 48.1% 58.6% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 39/39 1.7 2.6 64.2% 62.6% 48.2% 52.2% 41.8% 57.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 14/14 1.4 2.3 68.0% 55.7% 51.2% 49.2% 46.7% 54.0% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 2/2 0.0 4.0 64.6% 54.0% 36.8% 33.9% 28.6% 47.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 9/9 2.6 3.2 61.0% 59.1% 45.6% 48.4% 51.5% 53.9% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 485/588 2.0 2.4 64.8% 60.9% 46.8% 53.3% 49.3% 55.8% 43.5% — 163/186 1.8 3.6 60.1% 60.8% 45.6% 50.9% 49.4% 54.6% 42.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbora Strycova Casey Dellacqua
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1486 99.7 -1.59 +0.58 0.975 49.7% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1560 125.3 -0.39 +0.06 0.982 49.5% +6 +47 — 44.6% -0.23 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +0.54 2003 1489 100.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.02
19 2005 1488 101.4 -2.03 -2.32 0.722 43.0% -20 +118 — 38.9% -0.96 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +1.31 2004 1473 96.4 -3.43 -1.30 0.865 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.14
20 2006 1476 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03 2005 1475 101.7 -1.70 -1.14 0.860 46.6% +3 — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 0–1 — -0.05
21 2007 1455 104.6 -1.82 -2.44 0.799 45.3% — +102 — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2006 1501 113.4 -0.08 -1.23 0.504 37.7% -2 — — 37.5% -1.00 2–0 1–1 — -0.22
22 2008 1513 108.9 -1.54 +0.34 0.872 46.8% -67 +39 +49 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.4 -0.68 2007 1502 122.1 -1.56 -0.63 0.973 49.3% +17 — +91 43.2% -0.18 1–7 (13%) — — -0.01
23 2009 1523 111.3 -1.84 -2.43 0.894 47.3% -37 +41 +30 38.5% -0.94 8–4 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 -0.27 2008 1630 126.8 -0.29 +1.02 1.014 50.2% +9 -98 -24 47.5% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 103.0 +0.09
24 2010 1592 126.0 -0.57 -0.21 0.981 49.4% -74 +11 0 42.5% -0.22 6–5 (55%) 1–7 (13%) 99.2 -0.73 2009 1598 101.9 -2.95 -1.13 0.664 40.6% +4 — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.17
25 2011 1631 125.9 -1.85 +0.89 0.952 48.9% -4 -38 -72 45.6% -0.32 10–6 (63%) 7–7 (50%) 106.3 +0.05 2010 1563 103.6 -3.53 -0.93 0.814 45.4% +23 — — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.55
26 2012 1564 122.3 -2.92 -0.52 0.856 46.3% 0 +80 — 39.0% -0.84 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 97.6 -1.01 2011 1541 104.0 -1.59 -2.06 0.982 49.7% — -17 — 42.1% -0.26 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.43
27 2013 1584 113.7 -0.48 -1.63 0.938 48.6% -4 +37 — 44.0% -0.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.06 2012 1593 122.1 -1.70 -0.55 0.901 47.8% -3 — +45 42.3% -0.52 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.51
28 2014 1750 131.4 +0.37 -1.53 0.940 48.6% -58 -180 +19 52.5% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 9–1 (90%) 113.9 -1.52 2013 1490 95.2 -2.07 -4.32 0.712 44.0% +4 — — 15.8% -2.16 0–1 0–2 — +1.12
29 2015 1710 133.4 -0.27 +1.56 1.019 50.5% +15 -127 +9 52.8% +0.37 6–7 (46%) 4–12 (25%) 94.5 -0.44 2014 1742 139.6 +0.67 +0.45 1.011 50.3% -28 -176 -39 55.2% +0.23 13–6 (68%) 4–5 (44%) 108.7 +0.21
30 2016 1788 148.3 +1.78 +2.95 1.078 51.5% -21 -76 +12 59.3% +0.56 10–8 (56%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -1.68 2015 1629 117.9 -0.10 -0.71 0.929 48.4% -22 -90 +90 43.1% -0.65 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 -0.22
31 2017 1870 145.4 +1.20 +3.47 1.090 51.8% +2 -113 -62 59.7% +0.62 10–8 (56%) 8–3 (73%) 101.9 -1.07 2016 1613 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1766 138.7 +1.73 +0.59 1.042 50.7% -20 -44 +84 50.9% +0.05 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 93.8 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1715 131.2 +1.35 +0.33 1.004 50.0% -91 -3 +218 48.9% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 101.4 -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1680 123.1 -1.62 -0.90 0.894 47.8% -51 +11 — 34.4% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.3 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1650 103.2 -2.95 -1.14 0.741 43.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1600 110.3 -1.50 -0.90 0.921 48.4% — +75 +313 28.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1889 135.3 -0.01 +0.73 0.985 49.6% -21 -6 +60 47.9% -0.12 94–77 (55%) 63–73 (46%) 103.4 -0.94 — 1758 127.4 -0.70 -0.33 0.939 48.7% -5 -99 +29 43.8% -0.46 31–34 (48%) 14–22 (39%) 100.0 +0.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.