H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbora Strycova vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 1-0
Barbora Strycova holds a 1–0 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2005 Charleston second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2005* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Barbora Strycova | 6-3 6-4 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Strycova | #430 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,888 | 286 | 297 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Strycova | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #57 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #137 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #151 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 22 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2009 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #66 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 24 | 2010 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| 25 | 2011 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #89 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| 27 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| 28 | 2014 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #25 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| 29 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2016 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 31 | 2017 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #33 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| 33 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |
| 34 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #37 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #430 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |