H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbora Strycova vs Jill Craybas H2H: 0-2
Jill Craybas holds a 2–0 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jill Craybas leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2008 Indian Wells first round 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2008* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jill Craybas | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Barbora Strycova | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2004* | Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jill Craybas | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Barbora Strycova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Strycova | #430 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,888 | 286 | 297 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Strycova | Jill Craybas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #57 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #137 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #151 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #66 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #89 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #25 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2017 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #33 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #37 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #430 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |