H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Barbora Strycova vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 3-1

Barbora Strycova holds a 3–1 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2017 Madrid second round 5-7 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2017 Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Barbora Strycova #18 5-7 6-3 6-3 Lucie Safarova #38 Match data
Jan 5, 2017* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Barbora Strycova #20 7-5 3-6 7-6(4) Lucie Safarova #62 Match data
Jun 12, 2014* Birmingham WTA 500 R32 Grass Barbora Strycova #62 6-3 3-6 7-5 Lucie Safarova #21 Match data
Jul 10, 2010* Bastad WTA 250 QF Clay Lucie Safarova #25 6-4 7-6(4) Barbora Strycova #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 286 297 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbora Strycova Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 14–15 48.3% #57 1,562 0 0 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,490 0 0 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,477 0 0 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
21 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,456 0 0 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
22 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,524 0 0 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
27 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,584 0 1 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2016 35–23 60.3% #20 1,791 0 1 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,868 0 2 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7
32 2018 23–22 51.1% #33 1,765 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,713 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —