H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Barbora Strycova vs Rossana De Los Ríos H2H: 0-1

Rossana De Los Ríos holds a 1–0 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rossana De Los Ríos leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rossana De Los Ríos won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 7-6(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Rossana De Los Ríos
PAR Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rossana De Los Ríos #102 7-6(2) 6-3 Barbora Strycova #73 Match data May 25, 2010* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 288 300 49.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Rossana De Los Ríos #1,178 #51 788 1,622 64 120 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbora Strycova Rossana De Los Ríos
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #268 1,488 0 0
17 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0 1993 5–8 38.5% #118 1,538 0 0
18 2004 14–16 46.7% #57 1,560 0 0 1994 0–3 0.0% #462 1,504 0 0
19 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,523 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #270 1,488 0 0
24 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0 2000 5–5 50.0% #76 1,523 0 0
25 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1 2001 19–24 44.2% #54 1,601 0 0
26 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1 2002 14–23 37.8% #88 1,553 0 0
27 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,583 0 1 2003 3–15 16.7% #149 1,449 0 0
28 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1 2004 1–2 33.3% #200 1,454 0 0
29 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2016 36–24 60.0% #20 1,788 0 1 2006 0–1 0.0% #205 1,448 0 0
31 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,869 0 2 2007 0–3 0.0% #125 1,425 0 0
32 2018 24–23 51.1% #33 1,766 0 2 2008 7–14 33.3% #95 1,437 0 0
33 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,714 0 2 2009 6–9 40.0% #98 1,501 0 0
34 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2 2010 4–11 26.7% #178 1,480 0 0
35 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,600 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbora Strycova Rossana De Los Ríos
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 5 11 16 31.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2012 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 1 5 6 16.7% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2014 19 14 33 57.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 22 18 40 55.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 30 16 46 65.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2020 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 175 339 48.4% 77 86 163 47.2% 46 36 82 56.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — 30 53 83 36.1% 30 56 86 34.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 485/587 of Barbora Strycova's and 46/73 of Rossana De Los Ríos's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Barbora Strycova Rossana De Los Ríos
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/1 1.0 4.0 57.3% 57.8% 53.7% 56.3% 35.3% 56.1% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 5/30 1.0 4.4 54.2% 63.7% 41.8% 48.3% 52.7% 53.8% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 3/23 2.3 3.7 55.5% 53.2% 40.0% 42.9% 55.6% 47.5% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 3/7 1.0 3.7 67.6% 55.3% 40.0% 61.6% 52.8% 50.3% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 13/14 1.5 1.6 70.6% 55.6% 41.6% 47.5% 42.6% 51.2% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 24/33 1.0 2.1 68.2% 56.5% 46.4% 49.1% 49.5% 53.3% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 36/38 1.5 1.9 66.1% 59.3% 47.9% 56.1% 43.5% 55.5% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 46/50 1.6 1.7 65.6% 58.1% 45.4% 49.8% 53.5% 53.5% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 30/34 2.2 2.6 63.3% 56.4% 41.9% 50.2% 51.0% 50.9% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 7/11 2.4 2.7 65.0% 61.8% 45.8% 56.4% 54.5% 56.2% 41.1% 2003 2/18 0.0 3.0 64.5% 39.9% 37.3% 44.4% 0.0% 38.7% 24.6%
28 2014 42/52 2.4 2.7 60.7% 62.8% 46.2% 56.3% 47.1% 56.3% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 45/57 2.2 2.6 62.8% 63.8% 49.0% 56.2% 50.8% 57.8% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 55/60 2.4 2.2 66.8% 62.2% 48.0% 54.2% 52.3% 57.6% 45.7% 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 70.1% 61.7% 25.0% 61.5% 66.7% 50.7% 41.4%
31 2017 66/66 2.2 2.1 65.7% 62.6% 47.3% 54.7% 53.0% 57.2% 46.7% 2007 1/3 0.0 1.0 79.0% 53.1% 35.3% 30.0% 62.5% 49.4% 41.0%
32 2018 45/47 2.0 3.0 64.1% 64.4% 48.2% 55.6% 48.1% 58.6% 43.1% 2008 15/21 0.3 3.5 65.7% 52.5% 39.4% 54.9% 40.9% 48.3% 41.3%
33 2019 39/39 1.7 2.6 64.2% 62.6% 48.2% 52.2% 41.8% 57.3% 42.8% 2009 14/15 0.3 3.7 63.5% 54.2% 40.3% 51.9% 41.5% 48.5% 38.3%
34 2020 14/14 1.4 2.3 68.0% 55.7% 51.2% 49.2% 46.7% 54.0% 41.1% 2010 13/15 0.4 2.5 73.2% 54.7% 37.1% 50.7% 44.5% 49.7% 42.0%
35 2021 2/2 0.0 4.0 64.6% 54.0% 36.8% 33.9% 28.6% 47.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 9/9 2.6 3.2 61.0% 59.1% 45.6% 48.4% 51.5% 53.9% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 485/588 2.0 2.4 64.8% 60.9% 46.8% 53.3% 49.3% 55.8% 43.5% — 46/184 0.3 3.2 67.5% 53.3% 38.5% 51.9% 41.4% 48.4% 39.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbora Strycova Rossana De Los Ríos
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1489 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
17 2003 1486 99.7 -1.59 +0.58 0.975 49.7% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.15 1993 1539 109.1 — — — — +11 +17 — 33.3% -1.78 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.4 -0.33
18 2004 1560 125.3 -0.39 +0.06 0.982 49.5% +6 +47 — 44.6% -0.23 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +0.54 1994 1504 96.2 — — — — +9 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.04
19 2005 1488 101.4 -2.03 -2.32 0.722 43.0% -20 +118 — 38.9% -0.96 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1476 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1455 104.6 -1.82 -2.44 0.799 45.3% — +102 — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1513 108.9 -1.54 +0.34 0.872 46.8% -67 +39 +49 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.4 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1523 111.3 -1.84 -2.43 0.894 47.3% -37 +41 +30 38.5% -0.94 8–4 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 -0.27 1999 1489 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.09
24 2010 1592 126.0 -0.57 -0.21 0.981 49.4% -74 +11 0 42.5% -0.22 6–5 (55%) 1–7 (13%) 99.2 -0.73 2000 1523 109.6 — — — — -29 +54 — 45.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.82
25 2011 1631 125.9 -1.85 +0.89 0.952 48.9% -4 -38 -72 45.6% -0.32 10–6 (63%) 7–7 (50%) 106.3 +0.05 2001 1601 120.5 — — — — -70 +48 — 43.3% -0.41 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 110.0 +0.59
26 2012 1564 122.3 -2.92 -0.52 0.856 46.3% 0 +80 — 39.0% -0.84 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 97.6 -1.01 2002 1553 110.4 — — — — -15 +16 -14 42.2% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 96.8 +0.94
27 2013 1584 113.7 -0.48 -1.63 0.938 48.6% -4 +37 — 44.0% -0.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.06 2003 1450 99.1 -2.66 -3.40 0.402 31.8% +43 +9 — 21.1% -2.08 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.26
28 2014 1750 131.4 +0.37 -1.53 0.940 48.6% -58 -180 +19 52.5% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 9–1 (90%) 113.9 -1.52 2004 1454 110.2 — — — — +37 — — 42.9% -0.29 0–1 0–2 — +0.33
29 2015 1710 133.4 -0.27 +1.56 1.019 50.5% +15 -127 +9 52.8% +0.37 6–7 (46%) 4–12 (25%) 94.5 -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1788 148.3 +1.78 +2.95 1.078 51.5% -21 -76 +12 59.3% +0.56 10–8 (56%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -1.68 2006 1449 103.5 +0.91 +3.64 0.841 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.16
31 2017 1870 145.4 +1.20 +3.47 1.090 51.8% +2 -113 -62 59.7% +0.62 10–8 (56%) 8–3 (73%) 101.9 -1.07 2007 1426 98.2 -0.36 -2.28 0.811 45.3% — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.20
32 2018 1766 138.7 +1.73 +0.59 1.042 50.7% -20 -44 +84 50.9% +0.05 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 93.8 +0.13 2008 1437 92.1 -4.65 -1.78 0.798 44.9% +40 -8 — 33.3% -1.78 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.2 +0.31
33 2019 1715 131.2 +1.35 +0.33 1.004 50.0% -91 -3 +218 48.9% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 101.4 -0.77 2009 1502 103.8 -3.71 -3.39 0.743 43.6% -10 -46 — 37.1% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.17
34 2020 1680 123.1 -1.62 -0.90 0.894 47.8% -51 +11 — 34.4% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.3 +0.18 2010 1480 107.1 -3.00 -0.28 0.835 46.1% +10 -51 — 31.3% -1.63 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.27
35 2021 1650 103.2 -2.95 -1.14 0.741 43.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1600 110.3 -1.50 -0.90 0.921 48.4% — +75 +313 28.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1889 135.3 -0.01 +0.73 0.985 49.6% -21 -6 +60 47.9% -0.12 94–77 (55%) 63–73 (46%) 103.4 -0.94 — 1623 110.4 -3.60 -1.81 0.772 44.3% -16 +7 -14 36.1% -1.15 18–26 (41%) 21–16 (57%) 101.5 +0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.