H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Barbora Strycova vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–1 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on clay, while Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2009 's-Hertogenbosch third round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 18, 2009* 's-Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #47 6-1 6-3 Barbora Strycova #86 Match data
Jan 19, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #73 6-0 6-2 Barbora Strycova #55 Match data
May 20, 2004* Strasbourg WTA 500 R32 Clay Barbora Strycova #76 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 286 297 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbora Strycova Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 2004 14–15 48.3% #57 1,562 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,490 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,477 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,456 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,524 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,584 0 1 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2016 35–23 60.3% #20 1,791 0 1 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,868 0 2 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2018 23–22 51.1% #33 1,765 0 2 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,713 0 2 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
37 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4