H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Barbora Strycova vs Tatiana Perebiynis H2H: 0-1

Tatiana Perebiynis holds a 1–0 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Perebiynis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tatiana Perebiynis won the 2003 Wimbledon round of 128 6-4 5-7 11-9.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tatiana Perebiynis
UKR Age 43 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Perebiynis #89 6-4 5-7 11-9 Barbora Strycova #185 Match data Jun 25, 2003* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 288 300 49.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tatiana Perebiynis #1,227 #55 768 1,615 40 71 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbora Strycova Tatiana Perebiynis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #192 1,488 0 0
18 2004 14–16 46.7% #57 1,560 0 0 2001 2–4 33.3% #138 1,499 0 0
19 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,488 0 0 2002 5–7 41.7% #119 1,517 0 0
20 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,476 0 0 2003 7–10 41.2% #78 1,554 0 0
21 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,455 0 0 2004 10–15 40.0% #91 1,576 0 0
22 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0 2005 3–14 17.6% #214 1,458 0 0
23 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,523 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #161 1,484 0 0
24 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0 2007 2–4 33.3% #97 1,484 0 0
25 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1 2008 9–13 40.9% #90 1,572 0 0
26 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #867 1,557 0 0
27 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,583 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2016 36–24 60.0% #20 1,788 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,869 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 24–23 51.1% #33 1,766 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,714 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,600 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbora Strycova Tatiana Perebiynis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2007 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 6 7 13 46.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 5 11 16 31.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2011 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 19 14 33 57.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 22 18 40 55.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 30 16 46 65.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 175 339 48.4% 77 86 163 47.2% 46 36 82 56.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — 21 34 55 38.2% 12 26 38 31.6% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 485/587 of Barbora Strycova's and 43/92 of Tatiana Perebiynis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Barbora Strycova Tatiana Perebiynis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/1 1.0 4.0 57.3% 57.8% 53.7% 56.3% 35.3% 56.1% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 5/30 1.0 4.4 54.2% 63.7% 41.8% 48.3% 52.7% 53.8% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 3/23 2.3 3.7 55.5% 53.2% 40.0% 42.9% 55.6% 47.5% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/17 2.4 4.0 59.0% 64.6% 48.9% 53.1% 38.0% 57.9% 39.3%
21 2007 3/7 1.0 3.7 67.6% 55.3% 40.0% 61.6% 52.8% 50.3% 39.7% 2004 5/25 4.2 2.6 58.3% 62.4% 33.5% 35.0% 33.7% 50.6% 45.1%
22 2008 13/14 1.5 1.6 70.6% 55.6% 41.6% 47.5% 42.6% 51.2% 42.5% 2005 6/17 2.8 6.7 57.0% 63.0% 42.3% 52.1% 45.0% 53.7% 38.5%
23 2009 24/33 1.0 2.1 68.2% 56.5% 46.4% 49.1% 49.5% 53.3% 41.7% 2006 2/4 2.5 2.5 56.9% 63.0% 40.8% 31.4% 30.4% 53.1% 33.4%
24 2010 36/38 1.5 1.9 66.1% 59.3% 47.9% 56.1% 43.5% 55.5% 43.7% 2007 5/6 3.0 2.6 62.0% 62.8% 38.1% 50.6% 38.7% 53.5% 38.3%
25 2011 46/50 1.6 1.7 65.6% 58.1% 45.4% 49.8% 53.5% 53.5% 44.3% 2008 19/22 2.7 2.5 60.7% 62.2% 43.8% 47.5% 52.7% 55.1% 41.2%
26 2012 30/34 2.2 2.6 63.3% 56.4% 41.9% 50.2% 51.0% 50.9% 42.0% 2009 1/1 3.0 4.0 66.7% 57.4% 63.0% 37.5% 50.0% 59.3% 39.1%
27 2013 7/11 2.4 2.7 65.0% 61.8% 45.8% 56.4% 54.5% 56.2% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 42/52 2.4 2.7 60.7% 62.8% 46.2% 56.3% 47.1% 56.3% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 45/57 2.2 2.6 62.8% 63.8% 49.0% 56.2% 50.8% 57.8% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 55/60 2.4 2.2 66.8% 62.2% 48.0% 54.2% 52.3% 57.6% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 66/66 2.2 2.1 65.7% 62.6% 47.3% 54.7% 53.0% 57.2% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 45/47 2.0 3.0 64.1% 64.4% 48.2% 55.6% 48.1% 58.6% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 39/39 1.7 2.6 64.2% 62.6% 48.2% 52.2% 41.8% 57.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 14/14 1.4 2.3 68.0% 55.7% 51.2% 49.2% 46.7% 54.0% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 2/2 0.0 4.0 64.6% 54.0% 36.8% 33.9% 28.6% 47.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 9/9 2.6 3.2 61.0% 59.1% 45.6% 48.4% 51.5% 53.9% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 485/588 2.0 2.4 64.8% 60.9% 46.8% 53.3% 49.3% 55.8% 43.5% — 43/111 2.9 3.3 59.8% 62.6% 42.6% 46.7% 45.0% 54.5% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbora Strycova Tatiana Perebiynis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1486 99.7 -1.59 +0.58 0.975 49.7% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.15 2000 1489 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.04
18 2004 1560 125.3 -0.39 +0.06 0.982 49.5% +6 +47 — 44.6% -0.23 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +0.54 2001 1499 106.2 — — — — +10 — — 41.2% -0.65 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.42
19 2005 1488 101.4 -2.03 -2.32 0.722 43.0% -20 +118 — 38.9% -0.96 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +1.31 2002 1517 113.5 — — — — +21 +3 — 48.3% +0.21 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.04
20 2006 1476 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03 2003 1555 113.5 +0.84 -2.26 0.935 48.2% -9 -59 +76 44.4% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 +0.33
21 2007 1455 104.6 -1.82 -2.44 0.799 45.3% — +102 — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2004 1577 115.8 -1.40 +0.18 0.913 47.3% -12 -88 +27 46.4% -0.41 0–6 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 92.3 +0.62
22 2008 1513 108.9 -1.54 +0.34 0.872 46.8% -67 +39 +49 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.4 -0.68 2005 1458 105.0 -1.09 -2.12 0.832 46.3% +71 -37 — 28.6% -1.57 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.30
23 2009 1523 111.3 -1.84 -2.43 0.894 47.3% -37 +41 +30 38.5% -0.94 8–4 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 -0.27 2006 1484 101.4 -0.56 -1.98 0.711 43.3% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 — — +0.18
24 2010 1592 126.0 -0.57 -0.21 0.981 49.4% -74 +11 0 42.5% -0.22 6–5 (55%) 1–7 (13%) 99.2 -0.73 2007 1484 108.5 -1.64 -2.19 0.822 46.3% +53 — — 35.7% -1.21 1–1 — — +0.65
25 2011 1631 125.9 -1.85 +0.89 0.952 48.9% -4 -38 -72 45.6% -0.32 10–6 (63%) 7–7 (50%) 106.3 +0.05 2008 1573 124.1 +0.92 -0.90 0.917 48.5% -27 -48 — 40.4% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 102.3 -0.70
26 2012 1564 122.3 -2.92 -0.52 0.856 46.3% 0 +80 — 39.0% -0.84 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 97.6 -1.01 2009 1558 99.3 +0.80 -1.09 0.960 48.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.07
27 2013 1584 113.7 -0.48 -1.63 0.938 48.6% -4 +37 — 44.0% -0.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1750 131.4 +0.37 -1.53 0.940 48.6% -58 -180 +19 52.5% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 9–1 (90%) 113.9 -1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1710 133.4 -0.27 +1.56 1.019 50.5% +15 -127 +9 52.8% +0.37 6–7 (46%) 4–12 (25%) 94.5 -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1788 148.3 +1.78 +2.95 1.078 51.5% -21 -76 +12 59.3% +0.56 10–8 (56%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1870 145.4 +1.20 +3.47 1.090 51.8% +2 -113 -62 59.7% +0.62 10–8 (56%) 8–3 (73%) 101.9 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1766 138.7 +1.73 +0.59 1.042 50.7% -20 -44 +84 50.9% +0.05 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 93.8 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1715 131.2 +1.35 +0.33 1.004 50.0% -91 -3 +218 48.9% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 101.4 -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1680 123.1 -1.62 -0.90 0.894 47.8% -51 +11 — 34.4% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.3 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1650 103.2 -2.95 -1.14 0.741 43.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1600 110.3 -1.50 -0.90 0.921 48.4% — +75 +313 28.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1889 135.3 -0.01 +0.73 0.985 49.6% -21 -6 +60 47.9% -0.12 94–77 (55%) 63–73 (46%) 103.4 -0.94 — 1615 118.0 -0.01 -1.31 0.886 47.5% +6 -47 +54 40.6% -0.67 12–24 (33%) 7–16 (30%) 89.7 +0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.