H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Barbora Strycova vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-5

Venus Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2019 Beijing second round 6-3 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 29, 2019 Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #59 6-3 4-6 7-5 Barbora Strycova #34 Match data
Jul 28, 2016* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #6 6-3 6-0 Barbora Strycova #22 Match data
Feb 27, 2015* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #17 7-5 3-6 7-6(5) Barbora Strycova #22 Match data
Apr 2, 2014* Charleston WTA 500 R64 Clay Venus Williams #28 6-3 0-6 7-5 Barbora Strycova #56 Match data
Feb 28, 2009* Acapulco WTA 250 SF Clay Venus Williams #5 6-0 6-3 Barbora Strycova #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 286 297 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbora Strycova Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2004 14–15 48.3% #57 1,562 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,490 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,477 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,456 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,524 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,584 0 1 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2016 35–23 60.3% #20 1,791 0 1 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,868 0 2 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2018 23–22 51.1% #33 1,765 0 2 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,713 0 2 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,602 0 2 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47