H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Belinda Thompson vs Keryn Pratt H2H: 2-0

Belinda Thompson holds a 2–0 lead over Keryn Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Belinda Thompson leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Belinda Thompson won the 1980 Lee-On-Solent round of 32 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Belinda Thompson
GBR Age 70
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Keryn Pratt
AUS Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Belinda Thompson 6-2 6-0 Keryn Pratt Match data May 13, 1980* R32 Lee-On-Solent WTA 250 Clay
Belinda Thompson 2-6 6-3 6-4 Keryn Pratt Match data Jun 4, 1979* QF Bournemouth WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Belinda Thompson — — — 1,700 83 87 48.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Keryn Pratt — — — 1,601 29 35 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Belinda Thompson Keryn Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1973 4–7 36.4% — 1,478 0 0 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
18 1974 8–11 42.1% — 1,508 0 0 1977 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
19 1975 14–12 53.8% — 1,577 0 0 1978 7–7 50.0% — 1,511 0 0
20 1976 9–7 56.2% — 1,662 0 0 1979 5–6 45.5% — 1,530 0 0
21 1977 7–12 36.8% — 1,572 0 0 1980 14–14 50.0% — 1,571 0 0
22 1978 16–7 69.6% — 1,688 0 0 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,552 0 0
23 1979 5–11 31.2% — 1,548 0 0 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
24 1980 3–6 33.3% — 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1981 15–10 60.0% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1982 2–3 40.0% — 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Belinda Thompson Keryn Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1973 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1974 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1975 — — — — 8 6 14 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
20 1976 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 — — — — 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
22 1978 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1980 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 2 2 0.0% 34 33 67 50.7% 21 28 49 42.9% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — 10 15 25 40.0% 10 13 23 43.5% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Belinda Thompson Keryn Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1972 1497 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1973 1478 104.3 — — — — — +32 +61 36.0% -0.92 2–1 (67%) — — +0.63 1976 1506 99.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.34
18 1974 1508 113.3 — — — — — +37 +26 42.9% -0.19 2–2 (50%) — — +1.14 1977 1505 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% 0.00 — — — +0.19
19 1975 1578 117.1 — — — — — +9 -39 55.2% +0.66 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +2.79 1978 1511 113.3 — — — — — — -23 51.5% +0.36 2–5 (29%) 1–0 — +1.46
20 1976 1663 121.5 — — — — -52 +18 -112 55.6% +0.33 2–2 (50%) — — +0.87 1979 1530 108.7 — — — — — -38 +4 50.0% +0.17 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +1.49
21 1977 1573 99.1 — — — — +16 +73 -64 35.7% -1.12 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — +3.50 1980 1571 108.0 — — — — — -42 -11 43.8% -0.53 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 108.3 +1.44
22 1978 1688 119.6 — — — — — -42 -134 59.6% +0.56 7–1 (88%) 2–2 (50%) 107.1 +1.38 1981 1553 101.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 — 1–0 — +0.61
23 1979 1548 104.1 — — — — — +74 — 35.1% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) 95.8 +3.23 1982 1497 93.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — +0.12
24 1980 1526 106.1 — — — — — +39 — 41.2% +0.06 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 1579 114.0 — — — — — — +25 59.6% +0.85 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 95.9 +3.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 1549 105.4 — — — — — +4 — 45.5% -0.18 0–1 1–1 — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1700 116.4 — — — — -9 +32 -16 48.4% 0.00 21–21 (50%) 5–13 (28%) 94.5 +10.25 — 1601 110.6 — — — — — -41 -11 44.1% -0.28 10–9 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 105.0 +8.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.