H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Beth Herr vs Laura Arraya H2H: 3-1
Beth Herr holds a 3–1 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Beth Herr leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1989 Schenectady fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1989* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 7-5 6-1 | Beth Herr | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1986* | Tulsa | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Beth Herr | 6-0 2-0 (ret.) | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1986* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Beth Herr | 7-5 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1983* | Hartford | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Beth Herr | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Herr | #424 | #31 | 18 | 1,784 | 107 | 128 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beth Herr | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1982 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1985 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1986 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #52 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1987 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1988 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #132 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |