H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Beth Norton vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 0-2
Catherine Tanvier holds a 2–0 lead over Beth Norton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1982 Montreal second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1982* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Catherine Tanvier | 6-3 6-3 | Beth Norton | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1982* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Catherine Tanvier | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Beth Norton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Norton | #267 | #233 | 1 | 1,816 | 62 | 93 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beth Norton | Catherine Tanvier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 6–17 | 26.1% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |