H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC

Beth Norton vs Kate Glancy H2H: 0-1

Kate Glancy holds a 1–0 lead over Beth Norton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Glancy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Glancy won the 1981 Tokyo Japan Open round of 32 3-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Beth Norton
USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Glancy
CAN Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Glancy 3-6 6-2 6-1 Beth Norton Match data Oct 22, 1981* R32 Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beth Norton #267 #233 1 1,816 62 93 40.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kate Glancy — — — 1,582 20 35 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beth Norton Kate Glancy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1977 1–3 25.0% — 1,459 0 0
18 1975 3–2 60.0% — 1,572 0 0 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,461 0 0
19 1976 14–9 60.9% — 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,730 0 1 1980 1–5 16.7% — 1,422 0 0
21 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,765 0 1 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,423 0 0
22 1979 0–3 0.0% — 1,724 0 1 1982 14–15 48.3% — 1,455 0 0
23 1980 5–13 27.8% — 1,641 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1981 17–20 45.9% — 1,714 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1982 6–17 26.1% — 1,623 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1983 2–10 16.7% — 1,524 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1985 2–5 28.6% — 1,499 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beth Norton Kate Glancy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1975 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
23 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 23 35 34.3% 21 21 42 50.0% 16 25 41 39.0% 13 22 35 37.1% — 4 10 14 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beth Norton Kate Glancy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1492 95.3 — — — — — +24 — 33.3% -2.00 — — — +0.26
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1476 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.39
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1460 103.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.19
18 1975 1572 122.8 — — — — — +37 — 53.3% -0.07 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.42 1978 1461 102.3 — — — — +121 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 — — +0.18
19 1976 1726 133.2 — — — — — +25 -120 61.5% +0.89 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 +1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1731 106.0 — — — — -142 — — 38.5% -0.61 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.08 1980 1423 87.3 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.75 — — — +0.28
21 1978 1766 140.2 — — — — -78 — -105 54.2% -0.04 4–4 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 107.0 +0.38 1981 1424 99.1 — — — — +110 — — 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — +0.43
22 1979 1724 102.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.22 1982 1455 107.3 — — — — +25 +101 — 46.2% -0.15 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +3.23
23 1980 1642 118.0 — — — — -28 — -35 28.2% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — -1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1714 141.8 — — — — -5 +65 -133 48.3% -0.03 5–8 (38%) 3–8 (27%) 92.0 -2.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1623 124.6 — — — — +44 +28 -38 32.8% -0.90 5–7 (42%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1524 96.9 — — — — +48 — — 27.6% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 92.6 +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1500 97.3 — — — — — — +53 26.7% -1.87 1–0 0–1 — +1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1486 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1816 134.1 — — — — -15 +38 -68 42.9% -0.45 25–33 (43%) 14–19 (42%) 94.1 -1.19 — 1583 100.8 — — — — +68 +89 — 37.2% -0.95 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +9.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.