H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Beth Norton vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 1-1

Beth Norton and Lea Antonoplis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Beth Norton leads 1–0 on clay, while Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1982 Brisbane International round of 64 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Beth Norton
USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis 7-5 7-5 Beth Norton Match data Nov 17, 1982* R64 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Beth Norton 6-1 6-4 Lea Antonoplis Match data Sep 7, 1976* R32 US Open Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beth Norton — #233 1 1,816 62 93 40.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beth Norton Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 1975 3–2 60.0% — 1,572 0 0 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 1976 14–9 60.9% — 1,726 0 1 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0
20 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,730 0 1 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1
21 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,765 0 1 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1979 0–3 0.0% — 1,724 0 1 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2
23 1980 5–13 27.8% — 1,641 0 1 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1981 17–20 45.9% — 1,714 0 1 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1982 6–17 26.1% — 1,623 0 1 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1983 2–10 16.7% — 1,524 0 1 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2
28 1985 2–5 28.6% — 1,499 0 1 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 1 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beth Norton Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1975 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1983 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 23 35 34.3% 21 21 42 50.0% 16 25 41 39.0% 13 22 35 37.1% — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beth Norton Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
18 1975 1572 122.8 — — — — — +37 — 53.3% -0.07 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.42 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95
19 1976 1726 133.2 — — — — — +25 -120 61.5% +0.89 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 +1.09 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83
20 1977 1731 106.0 — — — — -142 — — 38.5% -0.61 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.08 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98
21 1978 1766 140.2 — — — — -78 — -105 54.2% -0.04 4–4 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 107.0 +0.38 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54
22 1979 1724 102.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.22 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94
23 1980 1642 118.0 — — — — -28 — -35 28.2% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — -1.15 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13
24 1981 1714 141.8 — — — — -5 +65 -133 48.3% -0.03 5–8 (38%) 3–8 (27%) 92.0 -2.09 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41
25 1982 1623 124.6 — — — — +44 +28 -38 32.8% -0.90 5–7 (42%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -1.77 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44
26 1983 1524 96.9 — — — — +48 — — 27.6% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 92.6 +1.23 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87
28 1985 1500 97.3 — — — — — — +53 26.7% -1.87 1–0 0–1 — +1.04 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66
29 1986 1486 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
Career — 1816 134.1 — — — — -15 +38 -68 42.9% -0.45 25–33 (43%) 14–19 (42%) 94.1 -1.19 — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.