H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Beth Norton vs Louise Field H2H: 0-1
Louise Field holds a 1–0 lead over Beth Norton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louise Field leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1985 Auckland semifinal 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1985* | Auckland | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Louise Field | 6-1 6-1 | Beth Norton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Norton | #267 | #233 | 1 | 1,816 | 62 | 93 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beth Norton | Louise Field | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 6–17 | 26.1% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |