H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Beth Norton vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-1
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Beth Norton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1982 Sydney second round 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 1982* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Beth Norton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Norton | #267 | #233 | 1 | 1,816 | 62 | 93 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beth Norton | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1976 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1978 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1981 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1982 | 6–17 | 26.1% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1983 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |
| 28 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |