H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Beth Norton vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-0

Beth Norton holds a 1–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beth Norton leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Beth Norton won the 1981 Dallas round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Beth Norton
USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Beth Norton 6-2 6-3 Mareen Louie Harper Match data Mar 12, 1981* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beth Norton — #233 1 1,816 62 93 40.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 179 240 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beth Norton Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1978 9–13 40.9% — 1,599 0 0
18 1975 3–2 60.0% — 1,572 0 0 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,575 0 0
19 1976 14–9 60.9% — 1,726 0 1 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,719 0 0
20 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,730 0 1 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,745 0 0
21 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,765 0 1 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,656 0 0
22 1979 0–3 0.0% — 1,724 0 1 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,672 0 0
23 1980 5–13 27.8% — 1,641 0 1 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,734 0 1
24 1981 17–20 45.9% — 1,714 0 1 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 1982 6–17 26.1% — 1,623 0 1 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 1983 2–10 16.7% — 1,524 0 1 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 1985 2–5 28.6% — 1,499 0 1 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 1 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beth Norton Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1975 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1983 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 23 35 34.3% 21 21 42 50.0% 16 25 41 39.0% 13 22 35 37.1% — 106 119 225 47.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beth Norton Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.37
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1520 116.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1599 122.7 — — — — +32 -41 — 39.2% -0.96 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.4 +0.50
18 1975 1572 122.8 — — — — — +37 — 53.3% -0.07 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.42 1979 1576 121.8 — — — — +27 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.40
19 1976 1726 133.2 — — — — — +25 -120 61.5% +0.89 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 +1.09 1980 1719 129.4 — — — — -38 -158 -41 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.4 +1.11
20 1977 1731 106.0 — — — — -142 — — 38.5% -0.61 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.08 1981 1746 134.8 — — — — -2 — -75 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -1.67
21 1978 1766 140.2 — — — — -78 — -105 54.2% -0.04 4–4 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 107.0 +0.38 1982 1656 125.3 — — — — -25 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.44
22 1979 1724 102.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.22 1983 1672 132.3 — — — — -12 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.3 -0.96
23 1980 1642 118.0 — — — — -28 — -35 28.2% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — -1.15 1984 1734 127.7 — — — — +24 — -95 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.48
24 1981 1714 141.8 — — — — -5 +65 -133 48.3% -0.03 5–8 (38%) 3–8 (27%) 92.0 -2.09 1985 1778 143.9 — — — — +52 — -156 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.23
25 1982 1623 124.6 — — — — +44 +28 -38 32.8% -0.90 5–7 (42%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -1.77 1986 1680 121.3 — — — — +20 — -64 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.36
26 1983 1524 96.9 — — — — +48 — — 27.6% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 92.6 +1.23 1987 1624 119.6 — — — — +7 — -16 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.21
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1614 129.2 — — — — +12 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.37
28 1985 1500 97.3 — — — — — — +53 26.7% -1.87 1–0 0–1 — +1.04 1989 1577 117.4 — — — — -17 — -22 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.28
29 1986 1486 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15 1990 1591 128.5 — — — — +9 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.5 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1816 134.1 — — — — -15 +38 -68 42.9% -0.45 25–33 (43%) 14–19 (42%) 94.1 -1.19 — 1911 135.4 — — — — +8 -84 -60 42.6% -0.56 76–57 (57%) 41–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.