H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Beth Norton vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 1-1
Beth Norton and Raffaella Reggi Concato are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Beth Norton leads 1–0 on carpet, while Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1983 Toronto second round 7-6 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1983 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 7-6 3-6 6-2 | Beth Norton | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1983* | Pittsburgh | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Beth Norton | 6-3 3-6 6-0 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Norton | #267 | #233 | 1 | 1,816 | 62 | 93 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beth Norton | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1978 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1981 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1982 | 6–17 | 26.1% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1983 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |