H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Beth Norton vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 0-2
Sylvia Hanika holds a 2–0 lead over Beth Norton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1983 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1983* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Sylvia Hanika | 6-1 6-3 | Beth Norton | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1982 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 6-3 6-3 | Beth Norton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Norton | #267 | #233 | 1 | 1,816 | 62 | 93 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beth Norton | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1976 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1978 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1981 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1982 | 6–17 | 26.1% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1983 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 |