H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Camille Benjamin H2H: 2-2

Betsy Nagelsen and Camille Benjamin are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Camille Benjamin leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1990 Canadian Open round of 64 2-6 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 70 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camille Benjamin #113 2-6 6-3 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen #61 Match data Aug 1, 1990* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Betsy Nagelsen #136 6-2 6-2 Camille Benjamin #84 Match data Aug 31, 1988* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Betsy Nagelsen #39 6-7 6-2 6-4 Camille Benjamin #64 Match data Jan 25, 1986* QF Wichita WTA 250 Carpet
Camille Benjamin 4-6 6-3 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Aug 10, 1983* R64 Manhattan Beach WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Betsy Nagelsen — #25 28 1,892 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Camille Benjamin — #27 13 1,821 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Camille Benjamin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,689 0 0
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,767 0 0
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,707 0 3 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,629 0 0
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,608 0 0
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,657 0 3 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,600 0 0
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,755 0 5 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,651 0 0
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,808 0 6 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,706 0 6 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,559 0 0
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,693 0 6 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,631 0 6 1993 1–3 25.0% — 1,516 0 0
28 1985 14–12 53.8% — 1,714 0 6 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,646 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% — 1,608 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% — 1,511 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,509 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Camille Benjamin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 14 12 26 53.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1987 12 9 21 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3% 1989 10 12 22 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1991 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3% — 95 106 201 47.3% 41 51 92 44.6% 24 37 61 39.3% 12 27 39 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Camille Benjamin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.54 1982 1690 123.6 — — — — +58 — -145 54.9% +0.38 9–5 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 105.7 +0.09
17 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.49 1983 1716 124.5 — — — — -16 -37 -117 45.0% -0.65 11–8 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 107.6 -1.48
18 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.24 1984 1768 138.9 — — — — -53 -5 -97 49.6% +0.05 9–10 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 100.2 -4.31
19 1976 1708 124.4 — — — — -64 -115 +73 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.59 1985 1629 116.9 — — — — +23 +3 +11 44.6% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 102.2 +2.67
20 1977 1678 124.1 — — — — -30 -106 +48 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.11 1986 1609 118.7 — — — — -5 +36 +19 43.4% -0.36 8–8 (50%) 4–11 (27%) 96.1 +1.68
21 1978 1658 129.7 — — — — -102 -84 +101 41.2% -0.57 4–11 (27%) 3–7 (30%) 91.9 -1.33 1987 1655 128.4 — — — — -4 -9 +6 46.8% -0.24 13–6 (68%) 3–5 (38%) 107.2 -0.10
22 1979 1695 123.1 — — — — -131 — +13 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.74 1988 1601 121.0 — — — — -5 +27 +18 41.7% -0.76 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 98.5 +0.03
23 1980 1756 131.7 — — — — -144 — +38 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -2.08 1989 1652 129.0 — — — — +3 -23 -85 43.9% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 1–8 (11%) 92.9 -1.46
24 1981 1809 135.3 — — — — -128 -307 +95 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.62 1990 1620 116.6 — — — — -24 +20 -56 32.2% -1.46 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -1.55
25 1982 1706 123.4 — — — — -98 -215 +169 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 +0.16 1991 1560 107.1 — — — — -32 +85 — 28.6% -1.90 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
26 1983 1693 127.0 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.86 1992 1528 113.1 — — — — -19 — — 23.1% -2.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.34
27 1984 1632 126.6 — — — — +58 -142 +116 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.78 1993 1517 101.5 — — — — -10 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.04
28 1985 1714 129.7 — — — — -25 — +88 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.14 1994 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
29 1986 1700 131.2 — — — — -55 — +170 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1646 121.7 — — — — -24 — +150 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -26 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1663 126.1 — — — — -56 — +97 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1640 115.1 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -50 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1893 132.2 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–129 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.0 +0.16 — 1822 128.5 — — — — -2 +2 -49 44.3% -0.48 70–64 (52%) 46–54 (46%) 102.4 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.