H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Cammy Macgregor H2H: 1-1

Betsy Nagelsen and Cammy Macgregor are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on grass, while Cammy Macgregor leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1992 Birmingham round of 64 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Cammy Macgregor
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Betsy Nagelsen 6-2 3-6 6-3 Cammy Macgregor #197 Match data Jun 10, 1992* R64 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Cammy Macgregor #138 7-5 3-6 6-1 Betsy Nagelsen #72 Match data Apr 29, 1989* QF Taipei WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,890 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Cammy Macgregor #625 #75 14 1,604 48 87 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Cammy Macgregor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1 1985 4–3 57.1% — 1,509 0 0
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3 1986 5–9 35.7% #77 1,534 0 0
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3 1987 11–17 39.3% #134 1,521 0 0
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1988 4–11 26.7% #188 1,503 0 0
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,678 0 3 1989 8–9 47.1% #96 1,577 0 0
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1990 8–16 33.3% #119 1,518 0 0
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5 1991 4–7 36.4% #166 1,520 0 0
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,753 0 5 1992 2–6 25.0% #198 1,515 0 0
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,806 0 6 1993 2–9 18.2% #194 1,456 0 0
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,705 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,713 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,585 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,639 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,607 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,509 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Cammy Macgregor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1990 4 8 12 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1991 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 1993 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3% — 32 48 80 40.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 6 16 22 27.3% 2 7 9 22.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Cammy Macgregor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.55 1985 1510 98.3 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.13 0–1 — — +0.27
17 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.58 1986 1535 112.3 — — — — +5 — +100 38.7% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.56
18 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.05 1987 1522 96.7 — — — — +33 — -14 37.7% -0.89 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) 99.9 +3.39
19 1976 1709 124.2 — — — — -65 -116 +70 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.73 1988 1504 126.9 — — — — +43 — — 37.1% -0.89 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.1 +0.12
20 1977 1678 123.8 — — — — -30 -105 +46 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 1989 1577 119.8 — — — — +24 — — 43.9% -0.68 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.5 +0.60
21 1978 1659 129.6 — — — — -99 -85 +99 40.7% -0.58 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 92.4 -0.84 1990 1518 107.0 — — — — +28 -16 — 38.2% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 97.7 +0.99
22 1979 1695 122.8 — — — — -132 — +12 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.65 1991 1521 113.3 — — — — +17 -24 — 41.4% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.55
23 1980 1753 130.7 — — — — -148 — +40 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -1.78 1992 1515 116.8 — — — — +43 — — 33.3% -1.11 0–2 — — -0.36
24 1981 1806 134.9 — — — — -129 -305 +99 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.53 1993 1456 107.1 — — — — +39 — +24 32.1% -1.04 1–5 (17%) — — +0.31
25 1982 1705 123.2 — — — — -99 -214 +170 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1693 126.7 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1631 126.4 — — — — +59 -141 +117 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1714 129.5 — — — — -26 — +87 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1699 131.1 — — — — -55 — +171 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1646 121.6 — — — — -24 — +148 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -27 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1662 126.0 — — — — -56 — +96 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1640 115.0 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -52 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1891 131.9 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–128 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.1 +0.27 — 1605 115.1 — — — — +29 -18 +24 39.3% -0.82 16–29 (36%) 10–15 (40%) 92.1 +4.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.