H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 1-2

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 2–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on carpet, while Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1985 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 1985* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch #8 7-5 6-1 Betsy Nagelsen #81 Match data
Aug 15, 1983 Toronto WTA 250 R32 Hard Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-4 6-1 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Jan 21, 1982* Seattle WTA 250 R32 Carpet Betsy Nagelsen 6-3 3-6 7-6 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —