H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Emiko Okagawa H2H: 1-0

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 1–0 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1987 Tokyo Japan Open third round 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Emiko Okagawa
Age 61

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 17, 1987* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R32 Hard Betsy Nagelsen #45 6-0 6-4 Emiko Okagawa Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Emiko Okagawa — — — 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Emiko Okagawa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,483 0 0
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,481 0 0
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,454 0 0
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,473 0 0
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1985 1–8 11.1% — 1,436 0 0
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1986 3–5 37.5% — 1,457 0 0
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1987 4–6 40.0% — 1,486 0 0
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1988 3–4 42.9% — 1,488 0 0
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 — — — — — — —
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —