H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Jo Durie H2H: 1-2

Jo Durie holds a 2–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jo Durie leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1992 Birmingham third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 1992* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Jo Durie #45 6-3 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen #337 Match data
Jun 14, 1990* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Betsy Nagelsen #63 7-5 6-2 Jo Durie #126 Match data
Nov 24, 1983* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Grass Jo Durie 6-4 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —