H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Kate Latham H2H: 5-1

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 5–1 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Betsy Nagelsen leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1981 Richmond fourth round 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Kate Latham
Age 73

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 1981* Richmond WTA 250 R16 Hard Betsy Nagelsen 7-6 6-3 Kate Latham Match data
Aug 20, 1980* Mahwah WTA 250 R64 Hard Betsy Nagelsen 6-1 3-6 6-3 Kate Latham Match data
Jun 27, 1980* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Betsy Nagelsen 4-6 6-1 6-4 Kate Latham Match data
Jul 11, 1975* Atlantic City WTA 250 R16 — Betsy Nagelsen 7-6 7-6 Kate Latham Match data
Apr 13, 1974* Phoenix Aztec WTA 250 QF Hard Kate Latham 4-6 7-6 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Mar 2, 1974* Winter Haven WTA 250 QF Clay Betsy Nagelsen 6-2 6-3 Kate Latham Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Kate Latham — — — 1,866 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,476 0 0
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,503 0 0
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,844 0 3
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,690 0 3
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,680 0 3
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,755 0 3
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,661 0 3
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,848 0 3
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,688 0 5
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,625 0 6
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,494 0 6
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,528 0 6
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —