H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 2-1

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 2–1 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on carpet, while Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1989 Taipei third round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 27, 1989* Taipei WTA 250 R32 Hard Betsy Nagelsen #72 6-4 6-1 Lea Antonoplis #150 Match data
Jan 14, 1987* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Grass Betsy Nagelsen #40 6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 Lea Antonoplis #182 Match data
Jan 19, 1978* Houston WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lea Antonoplis 3-6 7-6 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,774 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,579 0 0
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,559 0 0
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,626 0 0
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,665 0 0
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,717 0 0
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,724 0 1
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,735 0 2
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,719 0 2
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,572 0 2
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,460 0 2
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,413 0 2
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,455 0 2
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,448 0 2
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,432 0 2
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —