H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 3-2

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 3–2 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Betsy Nagelsen leads 2–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1989 Albuquerque semifinal 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 19, 1989* Albuquerque WTA 250 SF Hard Lori Mcneil #26 6-3 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen #49 Match data
Jun 21, 1989* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Betsy Nagelsen #63 6-2 1-6 6-1 Lori Mcneil #20 Match data
Jun 15, 1989* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Betsy Nagelsen #74 7-6 6-4 Lori Mcneil #16 Match data
Mar 3, 1989* Oklahoma WTA 250 R16 Hard Betsy Nagelsen #114 6-4 2-6 6-4 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data
Jul 2, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Lori Mcneil #77 7-5 6-1 Betsy Nagelsen #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —