H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Betsy Nagelsen vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 0-2
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik holds a 2–0 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik won the 1989 Moscow third round 2-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1989* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Betsy Nagelsen | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Betsy Nagelsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betsy Nagelsen | #692 | #25 | 28 | 1,885 | 266 | 324 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Betsy Nagelsen | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,695 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 22–27 | 44.9% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #77 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #81 | 1,714 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #61 | 1,645 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,640 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,608 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #418 | 1,561 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #394 | 1,512 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,510 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |