H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 0-4

Mima Jausovec holds a 4–0 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1981 Toronto second round 3-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 69 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 1981 Toronto WTA 250 R64 Hard Mima Jausovec 3-6 6-3 7-5 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Aug 14, 1978 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mima Jausovec 2-6 6-3 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Jun 4, 1978* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Mima Jausovec 6-4 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Feb 6, 1975* Akron WTA 250 R32 Hard Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-1 Betsy Nagelsen Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,088 339 246 57.9% 1 1 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,790 0 1
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,804 0 1
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1976 33–16 67.3% — 1,996 0 4
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,008 1 5
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,922 1 6
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,866 1 6
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,941 1 6
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,010 1 6
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,861 1 7
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —